Selection and evaluation method for distribution assumptions of aircraft buffet load based on statistics and rough set theory

Zhi Chun Yang, Shuai Chen, Bin Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aiming at tasks of fatigue spectrum development, buffet fatigue life estimation and strength certification, aircraft buffet problems were investigated by means of establishing a statistical distribution model of peak (or valley) values. But, the selection of probabilistic distribution models had evident effects on determining ultimate load cases, buffet cycles and amplitude distributions under a given flight condition. Five typical models including normal distribution, lognormal distribution, Weibull distribution, Rayleigh distribution and extreme value distribution usually used to describe the probabilistic distribution of peak (or valley) values of buffet fatigue loading were discussed firstly. Based on the probabilistic distributions given by parameters estimation, a distribution fitting index was proposed to evaluate the probabilistic distribution assumptions. Then, the analysis was performed by considering their matching levels between the distribution characteristics and the requirements of buffet loading data processing. The minimum discernible interval and the maximum resolution were acquired with the theory of rough set to eliminate judgment errors. Numerical example proved that this method can meet the requirement of evaluating probabilistic distribution assumptions well.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-11
Number of pages6
JournalZhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock
Volume31
Issue number5
StatePublished - 15 Mar 2012

Keywords

  • Buffet
  • Evaluation index
  • Fatigue loading
  • Probabilistic distribution
  • Resolution
  • Rough set

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selection and evaluation method for distribution assumptions of aircraft buffet load based on statistics and rough set theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this