TY - JOUR
T1 - Ranking 3D feature correspondences via consistency voting
AU - Yang, Jiaqi
AU - Xiao, Yang
AU - Cao, Zhiguo
AU - Yang, Weidong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - This paper addresses the 3D correspondence ordering problem by proposing a consistency voting (CV) method. Given a set of plausible feature correspondences generated via geometric feature matching, our goal is to rank these correspondences accurately and robustly such that reasonable correspondences can be located according to their rankings. The proposed method employs a voting-based scheme, which is based on the consistency check of each initial correspondence with a predefined voting set, to calculate a voting score for each correspondence. We consider two consistency terms, i.e., rigidity and local reference frame (LRF) affinity, to ensure a correct judge when two correspondences are compatible. LRF is an intrinsic canonical cue widely used in many existing local geometric features. The repeatability of LRFs helps to remove the ambiguity that sometimes arises from the rigidity check. The proposed CV method is evaluated on three public benchmarks including both LiDAR and Kinect data. Comparison with the state-of-the-art confirms the effectiveness and robustness of the CV method with respect to noise, varying point densities, clutter, occlusion, and changes in data modality. Furthermore, the proposed CV method can rank thousands of correspondences in real time.
AB - This paper addresses the 3D correspondence ordering problem by proposing a consistency voting (CV) method. Given a set of plausible feature correspondences generated via geometric feature matching, our goal is to rank these correspondences accurately and robustly such that reasonable correspondences can be located according to their rankings. The proposed method employs a voting-based scheme, which is based on the consistency check of each initial correspondence with a predefined voting set, to calculate a voting score for each correspondence. We consider two consistency terms, i.e., rigidity and local reference frame (LRF) affinity, to ensure a correct judge when two correspondences are compatible. LRF is an intrinsic canonical cue widely used in many existing local geometric features. The repeatability of LRFs helps to remove the ambiguity that sometimes arises from the rigidity check. The proposed CV method is evaluated on three public benchmarks including both LiDAR and Kinect data. Comparison with the state-of-the-art confirms the effectiveness and robustness of the CV method with respect to noise, varying point densities, clutter, occlusion, and changes in data modality. Furthermore, the proposed CV method can rank thousands of correspondences in real time.
KW - Consistency voting
KW - Correspondence ordering
KW - Local reference frame
KW - Rigidity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057054461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.patrec.2018.11.018
DO - 10.1016/j.patrec.2018.11.018
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85057054461
SN - 0167-8655
VL - 117
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Pattern Recognition Letters
JF - Pattern Recognition Letters
ER -