TY - GEN
T1 - Numerical analysis of scramjet isolator configurations of three different cross-sectional transition functions
AU - Cheng, Feng
AU - Tang, Shuo
AU - Li, Yi
AU - Cao, Su
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - The isolator is a key component of the scramjet engine integrated with the airframe. It can either accommodate high backpressure from intensive combustion at the supersonic combustion mode, or provide subsonic flow for effective combustion at subsonic combustion mode. The earlier studies on the isolators mainly focused on the constant-area cross-section configuration, while other configurations such as linear divergent and step isolators are rarely investigated. In this work, all of the three configurations with regard to the Mach number, the backpressure, the inflow angle, the divergent angle, and the step height and quantity are numerically investigated in this paper. The conclusions from the investigation show that the constant-area isolator has worse performance than the linear divergent and the step isolators in terms of start Mach number, backpressure tolerance and operating Mach number range. Moreover, the results suggest that it is prior to select a linear divergent isolator with the divergent angle of about 0.75° over the constant-area isoaltor. The step isolator with the small step height and a few steps has the best performance.
AB - The isolator is a key component of the scramjet engine integrated with the airframe. It can either accommodate high backpressure from intensive combustion at the supersonic combustion mode, or provide subsonic flow for effective combustion at subsonic combustion mode. The earlier studies on the isolators mainly focused on the constant-area cross-section configuration, while other configurations such as linear divergent and step isolators are rarely investigated. In this work, all of the three configurations with regard to the Mach number, the backpressure, the inflow angle, the divergent angle, and the step height and quantity are numerically investigated in this paper. The conclusions from the investigation show that the constant-area isolator has worse performance than the linear divergent and the step isolators in terms of start Mach number, backpressure tolerance and operating Mach number range. Moreover, the results suggest that it is prior to select a linear divergent isolator with the divergent angle of about 0.75° over the constant-area isoaltor. The step isolator with the small step height and a few steps has the best performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086687594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2017-2273
DO - 10.2514/6.2017-2273
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85086687594
SN - 9781624104633
T3 - 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Hypersonics 2017
BT - 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Hypersonics 2017
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Hypersonics 2017
Y2 - 6 March 2017 through 9 March 2017
ER -