TY - JOUR
T1 - Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft
AU - Li, Li
AU - Bai, Junqiang
AU - Qu, Feng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, AIAA International. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - The truss-braced-wing (TBW) aircraft is a promising innovative design for the next-generation airliner. Nevertheless, for a full TBW wing–body–tail configuration, it is still a challenge to perform the comprehensive refined aerodynamic design. Especially, the complex mutual interference among the wing, struts, and fuselage should be analyzed in detail. Meanwhile, for its one-design cruise condition with Ma 0.70 and CL 0.77, the aerodynamic explorations and performances of drag divergence and near-buffet-onset condition are also fateful. To address these issues, we utilize high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solver and gradient-based optimizer to conduct aerodynamic optimization designs, including a single-point optimization, a two-point optimization, and a three-point optimization. Results indicate that the single-point design obtains a nearly shock-free configuration with an approximate elliptical lift distribution and an L∕D of 24.09. Also, the refined local aerodynamic analyses lead to a good understanding of the complicated interactions with several junctions. For multipoint optimizations, both optimized configurations have the same level aerodynamic behavior on cruise condition compared with the single-point result, and they have a satisfying performance of drag divergence. Moreover, the three-point optimization design shows excellent aerodynamic efficiency with some extra off-design points evaluations, whereas the two-point optimization still has an undesirable off-design result.
AB - The truss-braced-wing (TBW) aircraft is a promising innovative design for the next-generation airliner. Nevertheless, for a full TBW wing–body–tail configuration, it is still a challenge to perform the comprehensive refined aerodynamic design. Especially, the complex mutual interference among the wing, struts, and fuselage should be analyzed in detail. Meanwhile, for its one-design cruise condition with Ma 0.70 and CL 0.77, the aerodynamic explorations and performances of drag divergence and near-buffet-onset condition are also fateful. To address these issues, we utilize high-fidelity Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solver and gradient-based optimizer to conduct aerodynamic optimization designs, including a single-point optimization, a two-point optimization, and a three-point optimization. Results indicate that the single-point design obtains a nearly shock-free configuration with an approximate elliptical lift distribution and an L∕D of 24.09. Also, the refined local aerodynamic analyses lead to a good understanding of the complicated interactions with several junctions. For multipoint optimizations, both optimized configurations have the same level aerodynamic behavior on cruise condition compared with the single-point result, and they have a satisfying performance of drag divergence. Moreover, the three-point optimization design shows excellent aerodynamic efficiency with some extra off-design points evaluations, whereas the two-point optimization still has an undesirable off-design result.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139707990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/1.C036413
DO - 10.2514/1.C036413
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85139707990
SN - 0021-8669
VL - 59
SP - 1179
EP - 1194
JO - Journal of Aircraft
JF - Journal of Aircraft
IS - 5
ER -