Does Having a Critical Mass of Women on the Board Result in More Corporate Environmental Actions? Evidence From China

Mijia Gong, Zhe Zhang, Ming Jia, Judith L. Walls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Arguments based on ethical sensitivity differences, gender-based functional differences, and gender discrimination suggest that having more women on the board of directors improves corporate environmental actions (CEA). However, empirical evidence of this relationship has provided inconsistent results. To explore this inconsistency, we draw on critical mass theory to examine how women on boards influence CEA. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms during 2010–2016, we find that firms with a critical mass of at least three female directors on their boards engage in both higher quality and faster speed of environmental actions. In addition, we find that government monitoring (as a formal institution) positively moderates this relationship. We also find that local religious ideology (as an informal institution) positively moderates the relationship between critical mass of women on the boards and CEA speed. Our findings provide insights about gender diversity on boards to corporations and policymakers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1106-1144
Number of pages39
JournalGroup and Organization Management
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • corporate environmental actions
  • critical mass theory
  • formal institution
  • government monitoring
  • informal institution
  • religious ideology
  • women on board of directors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Having a Critical Mass of Women on the Board Result in More Corporate Environmental Actions? Evidence From China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this