TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between impression creep and uni-axial tensile creep performed on nickel-based single crystal superalloys
AU - Yan, Wuzhu
AU - Wen, Shifeng
AU - Liu, Jun
AU - Yue, Zhufeng
PY - 2010/3/25
Y1 - 2010/3/25
N2 - The purpose of the present work is to build the relationship between impression creep and conventional uni-axial tensile creep in determining crystallographic creep parameters for face centered cubic (FCC) nickel-based single crystal superalloys. To this aim, the impression creep performed on [0 0 1]-, [0 1 1]-, and [1 1 1]-oriented nickel-based single crystal superalloys were respectively investigated and the data was compared with those obtained with uni-axial tensile creep counterparts. It shows that the determination of crystallographic creep stress exponent is independent of crystallographic orientations, and the results agree reasonably well between impression creep and uni-axial tensile creep. However, some reveres dependence of crystallographic orientation was observed between impression creep and uni-axial tensile creep, such as the steady-state punch velocity for impression creep and steady-state elongation rate for uni-axial tensile creep, and this induced different stress conversion factors among different crystallographic orientations. Crown
AB - The purpose of the present work is to build the relationship between impression creep and conventional uni-axial tensile creep in determining crystallographic creep parameters for face centered cubic (FCC) nickel-based single crystal superalloys. To this aim, the impression creep performed on [0 0 1]-, [0 1 1]-, and [1 1 1]-oriented nickel-based single crystal superalloys were respectively investigated and the data was compared with those obtained with uni-axial tensile creep counterparts. It shows that the determination of crystallographic creep stress exponent is independent of crystallographic orientations, and the results agree reasonably well between impression creep and uni-axial tensile creep. However, some reveres dependence of crystallographic orientation was observed between impression creep and uni-axial tensile creep, such as the steady-state punch velocity for impression creep and steady-state elongation rate for uni-axial tensile creep, and this induced different stress conversion factors among different crystallographic orientations. Crown
KW - Crystal plasticity
KW - Finite element
KW - Impression creep
KW - Uni-axial tensile creep
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75849161058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.035
DO - 10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.035
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:75849161058
SN - 0921-5093
VL - 527
SP - 1850
EP - 1855
JO - Materials Science and Engineering: A
JF - Materials Science and Engineering: A
IS - 7-8
ER -