An aerodynamic design method of propeller airfoils with geometric compatibility as constraints

Jian Hua Xu, Hui Jing Li, Wen Ping Song, Zhong Hua Han

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Mach number and Reynolds number vary widely from root to tip for a propeller blade, resulting complex flow at low-speed, subsonic and even transonic. Low-speed airfoils are used for inboard and high-speed airfoils are used for outboard, leading to a great challenge to ensure the aerodynamic compatibility and geometric compatibility of the airfoils under different design conditions. In this paper, some constraints, such as the locations of maximum thickness, coordinates of airfoils with adjacent thickness, and second-order derivative distribution of airfoil shape, are applied in the design optimization of propeller airfoil family, to achieve good geometric compatibility among airfoils. Reynolds-average Navier-Stokes (RANS) solver coupled with transition model and the efficient optimizer “SurroOpt” are used to perform the optimization. The results show that the optimized airfoils with second-order derivative as constraints behave the best geometric compatibility, and the lift-to-drag ratio at the design condition is also improved significantly, which demonstrates that the proposed method is effective in the design of airfoil family for propeller.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAIAA Aviation 2019 Forum
PublisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
Pages1-26
Number of pages26
ISBN (Print)9781624105890
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019
EventAIAA Aviation 2019 Forum - Dallas, United States
Duration: 17 Jun 201921 Jun 2019

Publication series

NameAIAA Aviation 2019 Forum

Conference

ConferenceAIAA Aviation 2019 Forum
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityDallas
Period17/06/1921/06/19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An aerodynamic design method of propeller airfoils with geometric compatibility as constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this