Aboveground-belowground biodiversity linkages differ in early and late successional temperate forests

Hui Li, Xugao Wang, Chao Liang, Zhanqing Hao, Lisha Zhou, Sam Ma, Xiaobin Li, Shan Yang, Fei Yao, Yong Jiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding ecological linkages between above- and below-ground biota is critical for deepening our knowledge on the maintenance and stability of ecosystem processes. Nevertheless, direct comparisons of plant-microbe diversity at the community level remain scarce due to the knowledge gap between microbial ecology and plant ecology. We compared the α- and β- diversities of plant and soil bacterial communities in two temperate forests that represented early and late successional stages. We documented different patterns of aboveground-belowground diversity relationships in these forests. We observed no linkage between plant and bacterial α-diversity in the early successional forest, and even a negative correlation in the late successional forest, indicating that high bacterial α-diversity is not always linked to high plant α-diversity. Beta-diversity coupling was only found at the late successional stage, while in the early successional forest, the bacterial β-diversity was closely correlated with soil property distances. Additionally, we showed that the dominant competitive tree species in the late successional forest may play key roles in driving forest succession by shaping the soil bacterial community in the early successional stage. This study sheds new light on the potential aboveground-belowground linkage in natural ecosystems, which may help us understand the mechanisms that drive ecosystem succession.

Original languageEnglish
Article number12234
JournalScientific Reports
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aboveground-belowground biodiversity linkages differ in early and late successional temperate forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this