TY - JOUR
T1 - 基于耦合伴随方法的串/并行气动结构优化设计对比
AU - Lei, Ruiwu
AU - Bai, Junqiang
AU - Xu, Danyang
AU - Zhang, Yu
AU - Wang, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Editorial Department of Journal of Aerospace Power. All right reserved.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - The RANS(Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) equation, linear finite element analysis method, local mapping point link method and inverse distance weighting interpolation method were used to analyze the coupling between aerodynamic and structural variables. The gradients of merit function to aerodynamic and structure design variables were solved efficiently using aerostructural coupled adjoint technique. These modules were integrated with free form deformation module and gradient-based optimizer to form an aerostructural optimization design framework. A blend wing body aircraft was chosen to conduct sequential and concurrent aerostructural optimization. Results showed that the concurrent approach achieved 8.4% more range and 8.3% less structural weight, compared with the sequential approach on the same drag level. Moreover, the sequential approach had obvious shock wave on a significant portion of the outer wing. Meanwhile, the concurrent approach exhibited parallel pressure contour lines with roughly equal spacing indicating a shock-free result. All the results confirm that concurrent optimization for the design of the aeroelastic system provides significant advantages over the sequential approach. Given these improvements, the presented methods have the potential to be a useful tool in high flexibility aeroelastic design problems.
AB - The RANS(Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) equation, linear finite element analysis method, local mapping point link method and inverse distance weighting interpolation method were used to analyze the coupling between aerodynamic and structural variables. The gradients of merit function to aerodynamic and structure design variables were solved efficiently using aerostructural coupled adjoint technique. These modules were integrated with free form deformation module and gradient-based optimizer to form an aerostructural optimization design framework. A blend wing body aircraft was chosen to conduct sequential and concurrent aerostructural optimization. Results showed that the concurrent approach achieved 8.4% more range and 8.3% less structural weight, compared with the sequential approach on the same drag level. Moreover, the sequential approach had obvious shock wave on a significant portion of the outer wing. Meanwhile, the concurrent approach exhibited parallel pressure contour lines with roughly equal spacing indicating a shock-free result. All the results confirm that concurrent optimization for the design of the aeroelastic system provides significant advantages over the sequential approach. Given these improvements, the presented methods have the potential to be a useful tool in high flexibility aeroelastic design problems.
KW - Aeroelastic analysis
KW - Aerostructural coupled adjoint
KW - Aerostructural optimization
KW - Blended wing body
KW - Sequential and concurrent optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071002942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.009
DO - 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.009
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85071002942
SN - 1000-8055
VL - 34
SP - 1036
EP - 1049
JO - Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power
JF - Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power
IS - 5
ER -