TY - GEN
T1 - Seq2Seq Deep Learning Models for Microtext Normalization
AU - Satapathy, Ranjan
AU - Li, Yang
AU - Cavallari, Sandro
AU - Cambria, Erik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Microtext analysis is a crucial task for gauging social media opinion. In this paper, we compare four different deep learning encoder-decoder frameworks to handle microtext normalization problem. The frameworks have been evaluated on four different datasets in three different domains. To understand the impact of microtext normalization, we further integrate the framework into a sentiment classification task. This paper is the first of its kind to incorporate deep learning into a microtext normalization module and improve the sentiment analysis task. We show our models as a sequence to sequence character to word encoder-decoder model. We compare four deep learning models for microtext normalization task which further improve the accuracy of the sentiment analysis. Results show that the attentive LSTM and GRU cell both increase the sentiment analysis accuracy in the range of 4%-7% whereas LSTM and CNN with LSTM improve the accuracy in the range of 2%-4%.
AB - Microtext analysis is a crucial task for gauging social media opinion. In this paper, we compare four different deep learning encoder-decoder frameworks to handle microtext normalization problem. The frameworks have been evaluated on four different datasets in three different domains. To understand the impact of microtext normalization, we further integrate the framework into a sentiment classification task. This paper is the first of its kind to incorporate deep learning into a microtext normalization module and improve the sentiment analysis task. We show our models as a sequence to sequence character to word encoder-decoder model. We compare four deep learning models for microtext normalization task which further improve the accuracy of the sentiment analysis. Results show that the attentive LSTM and GRU cell both increase the sentiment analysis accuracy in the range of 4%-7% whereas LSTM and CNN with LSTM improve the accuracy in the range of 2%-4%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073210329&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851895
DO - 10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8851895
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85073210329
T3 - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
BT - 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2019
Y2 - 14 July 2019 through 19 July 2019
ER -