TY - GEN
T1 - Performances analysis of polar codes decoding algorithms over variant binary-input channels
AU - Xie, Wenjiao
AU - Tian, Ruifu
AU - Li, Lixin
AU - Bao, Tao
AU - Zhang, Huisheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 IEEE.
PY - 2015/11/25
Y1 - 2015/11/25
N2 - In this paper, the performance of state of the art decoding methods of polar codes, such as the SC (Successive Cancellation), BP (belief propagation), LP (Linear Programming), LSC(List Successive Cancellation) and ML(Maximum Likelihood) decoding, over different binary-input discrete memoryless channels (B-DMCs) are presented. Simulation results indicate that decoding algorithms of polar codes have the performances of the estimated bit error rate (BER) below the order of 10-5. In addition, we came to the conclusion that BP algorithm outperforms SC at the cost of computational complexity. The performance of LP decoder is better than BP and the complexity is less than BP scheme, however, it can only be used in binary erasure channels (BECs). ML decoder has the best performance, but its high complexity makes it act as a reference to reveal the gap between ML and other algorithms. In order to remedy the performance deficiencies without any significant increase in decoding complexity, we further study the concatenated polar codes - the polar-LDPC(Low Density Parity Check) concatenation scheme, which is substantially outperforms ML decoding. What's more, the concatenated Polar-LDPC codes can remedy the error floor of LDPC codes. We firmly believed that the concatenated scheme of polar-LDPC would be a prominent technique in 5G (5th-generation) to support the more reliable transmission demand.
AB - In this paper, the performance of state of the art decoding methods of polar codes, such as the SC (Successive Cancellation), BP (belief propagation), LP (Linear Programming), LSC(List Successive Cancellation) and ML(Maximum Likelihood) decoding, over different binary-input discrete memoryless channels (B-DMCs) are presented. Simulation results indicate that decoding algorithms of polar codes have the performances of the estimated bit error rate (BER) below the order of 10-5. In addition, we came to the conclusion that BP algorithm outperforms SC at the cost of computational complexity. The performance of LP decoder is better than BP and the complexity is less than BP scheme, however, it can only be used in binary erasure channels (BECs). ML decoder has the best performance, but its high complexity makes it act as a reference to reveal the gap between ML and other algorithms. In order to remedy the performance deficiencies without any significant increase in decoding complexity, we further study the concatenated polar codes - the polar-LDPC(Low Density Parity Check) concatenation scheme, which is substantially outperforms ML decoding. What's more, the concatenated Polar-LDPC codes can remedy the error floor of LDPC codes. We firmly believed that the concatenated scheme of polar-LDPC would be a prominent technique in 5G (5th-generation) to support the more reliable transmission demand.
KW - 5th-generation
KW - binary input channels
KW - decoding algorithms
KW - error floor
KW - Polar codes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960983898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICSPCC.2015.7338951
DO - 10.1109/ICSPCC.2015.7338951
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:84960983898
T3 - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, ICSPCC 2015
BT - 2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, ICSPCC 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 5th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, ICSPCC 2015
Y2 - 19 September 2015 through 22 September 2015
ER -