TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel Classification of Inclusion Defects in Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Based on THz-TDS and One-Dimensional Neural Network Sequential Models
AU - Shi, Yue
AU - Li, Xuanhui
AU - Ao, Jianwei
AU - Liu, Keju
AU - Li, Yuan
AU - Cheng, Hui
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Fiber-reinforced composites, such as glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), are widely used across industries but are susceptible to inclusion defects during manufacturing. Detecting and classifying these defects is crucial for ensuring material integrity. This study classifies four common inclusion defects—metal, peel ply, release paper, and PTFE film—in GFRP using terahertz technology and machine learning. Two GFRP sheets with inclusion defects at different depths were fabricated. Terahertz time-domain signals were acquired, and a cross-correlation-based deconvolution algorithm extracted impulse responses. LSTM-RNN, Bi-LSTM RNN, and 1D-CNN models were trained and tested on time-domain, frequency-domain, and impulse response signals. The defect-free region exhibited the highest classification accuracy. Bi-LSTM RNN achieved the best recall and macro F1-score, followed by 1D-CNN, while LSTM-RNN performed worse. Training with impulse response signals improved classification while maintaining accuracy.
AB - Fiber-reinforced composites, such as glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), are widely used across industries but are susceptible to inclusion defects during manufacturing. Detecting and classifying these defects is crucial for ensuring material integrity. This study classifies four common inclusion defects—metal, peel ply, release paper, and PTFE film—in GFRP using terahertz technology and machine learning. Two GFRP sheets with inclusion defects at different depths were fabricated. Terahertz time-domain signals were acquired, and a cross-correlation-based deconvolution algorithm extracted impulse responses. LSTM-RNN, Bi-LSTM RNN, and 1D-CNN models were trained and tested on time-domain, frequency-domain, and impulse response signals. The defect-free region exhibited the highest classification accuracy. Bi-LSTM RNN achieved the best recall and macro F1-score, followed by 1D-CNN, while LSTM-RNN performed worse. Training with impulse response signals improved classification while maintaining accuracy.
KW - cross-correlation
KW - defect classification
KW - GFRP
KW - inclusion defects
KW - neural network
KW - terahertz technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001119970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/photonics12030250
DO - 10.3390/photonics12030250
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105001119970
SN - 2304-6732
VL - 12
JO - Photonics
JF - Photonics
IS - 3
M1 - 250
ER -