TY - JOUR
T1 - Morphing wing design of truss-braced-wing aircraft through aerodynamic shape optimization using the adjoint method
AU - Li, Li
AU - Zhang, Yu
AU - Bai, Junqiang
AU - Toropov, Vassili
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - It is still a challenge to evaluate the benefits of the morphing wing concept with a truss-braced wing wing–body–tail configuration. To address this problem, first, a fair baseline configuration is obtained with a multipoint optimization over six flight conditions. Then, three types of morphing wing design are investigated and compared based on the baseline shape. The results indicate that the simplified variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap system has the smallest and limited benefit, with only a 0.70% weighted aerodynamic efficiency improvement, which may not be sufficient to cover the extra burden of the increased complexity and weight. The trailing-edge morphing design has a larger benefit, with an efficiency improvement of 1.73%, while the full-wing morphing design achieved the greatest benefit, with a 5.79% efficiency improvement, demonstrating the attractive aerodynamic potential and benefits of the truss-braced-wing aircraft. Further discussion on the drag-reduction sources and some design features is also presented.
AB - It is still a challenge to evaluate the benefits of the morphing wing concept with a truss-braced wing wing–body–tail configuration. To address this problem, first, a fair baseline configuration is obtained with a multipoint optimization over six flight conditions. Then, three types of morphing wing design are investigated and compared based on the baseline shape. The results indicate that the simplified variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap system has the smallest and limited benefit, with only a 0.70% weighted aerodynamic efficiency improvement, which may not be sufficient to cover the extra burden of the increased complexity and weight. The trailing-edge morphing design has a larger benefit, with an efficiency improvement of 1.73%, while the full-wing morphing design achieved the greatest benefit, with a 5.79% efficiency improvement, demonstrating the attractive aerodynamic potential and benefits of the truss-braced-wing aircraft. Further discussion on the drag-reduction sources and some design features is also presented.
KW - Truss-braced-wing configuration
KW - adjoint method
KW - aerodynamic design optimization
KW - aerodynamic performance
KW - morphing wing designs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213382605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0305215X.2024.2420746
DO - 10.1080/0305215X.2024.2420746
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85213382605
SN - 0305-215X
JO - Engineering Optimization
JF - Engineering Optimization
ER -