TY - JOUR
T1 - Micro-information-level AR instruction
T2 - a new visual representation supporting manual classification of similar assembly parts
AU - Wang, Zhuo
AU - Wang, Yang
AU - Bai, Xiaoliang
AU - Zhang, Shusheng
AU - He, Weiping
AU - Zhang, Xiangyu
AU - Han, Shu
AU - Yan, Yuxiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - In AR operation guidance training, for assembly parts with similar geometric shapes, there are still two problems in the visual representation of AR instructions: (1) AR instructions cannot accurately represent the micro-geometric differences between similar parts. (2) The AR instruction design specification that reflects the micro-geometric differences of similar parts has not been formulated. Based on such a problem, our team has carried out the following research work: First, the geometric features of parts are defined at the micro-geometric level and micro-information level, thereby explaining the relationships and differences between similar part features. From the above two levels. Secondly, a mathematical model of the geometric features of the parts is established, and the control parameters in the model are given to characterize the feature differences between similar parts. To verify the accuracy of the control parameters, we designed three AR instructions based on the control parameters and verified them through five hypotheses. Our team then analyzed the data from a case study and focused our discussion on test results that did not meet expectations. We have a more in-depth discussion by comparing the differences and analyzing the results. Finally, three implications of AR instructions in representing feature differences between similar parts are given, and future research directions for such work are indicated. It is provided guidance for future research.
AB - In AR operation guidance training, for assembly parts with similar geometric shapes, there are still two problems in the visual representation of AR instructions: (1) AR instructions cannot accurately represent the micro-geometric differences between similar parts. (2) The AR instruction design specification that reflects the micro-geometric differences of similar parts has not been formulated. Based on such a problem, our team has carried out the following research work: First, the geometric features of parts are defined at the micro-geometric level and micro-information level, thereby explaining the relationships and differences between similar part features. From the above two levels. Secondly, a mathematical model of the geometric features of the parts is established, and the control parameters in the model are given to characterize the feature differences between similar parts. To verify the accuracy of the control parameters, we designed three AR instructions based on the control parameters and verified them through five hypotheses. Our team then analyzed the data from a case study and focused our discussion on test results that did not meet expectations. We have a more in-depth discussion by comparing the differences and analyzing the results. Finally, three implications of AR instructions in representing feature differences between similar parts are given, and future research directions for such work are indicated. It is provided guidance for future research.
KW - Assembly instruction
KW - Augmented reality
KW - Manual classification
KW - Visual representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136568899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11042-022-13574-9
DO - 10.1007/s11042-022-13574-9
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85136568899
SN - 1380-7501
VL - 82
SP - 11589
EP - 11618
JO - Multimedia Tools and Applications
JF - Multimedia Tools and Applications
IS - 8
ER -