TY - JOUR
T1 - An improved algorithm for Finite Particle Method considering Lagrange-type remainder
AU - Yang, Yang
AU - Li, Yaoyu
AU - Xu, Fei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - The Finite Particle Method (FPM) is a significant improvement to the traditional Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics method (SPH), which can greatly improve the computational accuracy of the entire computational domain. However, unstable calculation results and long computational time are still major obstacles to the development of FPM. Based on matrix decomposition, the fundamental equations of the traditional Finite Particle Method are rewritten and a Generalized Finite Particle Method (GFPM) is derived by introducing Lagrange-type remainder. By deriving and rewriting the fundamental equations, the GFPM method can be theoretically proven to be always stable. Numerical examples show that the GFPM method can utilize a smaller computational scale to achieve the same computational accuracy as the FPM method, with a corresponding reduction in computational time. Finally, the GFPM method is applied to a one-dimensional stress wave propagation problem and a one-dimensional heat conduction problem, and the computational results are compared with those of the SPH method and the FPM method, which verify that the GFPM has higher computational accuracy and stability.
AB - The Finite Particle Method (FPM) is a significant improvement to the traditional Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics method (SPH), which can greatly improve the computational accuracy of the entire computational domain. However, unstable calculation results and long computational time are still major obstacles to the development of FPM. Based on matrix decomposition, the fundamental equations of the traditional Finite Particle Method are rewritten and a Generalized Finite Particle Method (GFPM) is derived by introducing Lagrange-type remainder. By deriving and rewriting the fundamental equations, the GFPM method can be theoretically proven to be always stable. Numerical examples show that the GFPM method can utilize a smaller computational scale to achieve the same computational accuracy as the FPM method, with a corresponding reduction in computational time. Finally, the GFPM method is applied to a one-dimensional stress wave propagation problem and a one-dimensional heat conduction problem, and the computational results are compared with those of the SPH method and the FPM method, which verify that the GFPM has higher computational accuracy and stability.
KW - Computational time
KW - Finite Particle Method
KW - Lagrange-type remainder
KW - Matrix decomposition
KW - Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191877041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105754
DO - 10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105754
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85191877041
SN - 0955-7997
VL - 164
JO - Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
JF - Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
M1 - 105754
ER -