Study of static and dynamic ploughing mechanisms by establishing generalized model with static milling forces

Min Wan, Ying Chao Ma, Jia Feng, Wei Hong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

86 Scopus citations

Abstract

Studies on ploughing mechanism were separately treated for static and dynamic cutting processes in the literature. In this paper, a generalized method, which is suitable for exploring the ploughing mechanism of both static and dynamic cuts, is presented by only using the static milling forces. Whether for static or dynamic cutting processes, a unified proportional form is used to express ploughing forces as function of the volume of the materials extruded under the clearance face of the tool, and the corresponding proportional scale is named ploughing force coefficient. To facilitate identifying the ploughing force coefficient, the total static milling force is decomposed into two parts, i.e. the shearing force component and the ploughing force component, and then the ploughing force coefficient is identified using the ploughing force component. It is observed that the relative error between the determined ploughing force coefficient and the one obtained by using dynamic signals in existing method is less than two percent. Besides, determination procedure is also specially developed to calibrate shear angle, shear stress and friction constant based on the separated shearing force component. Both static and dynamic milling tests are used to validate the proposed model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-131
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Volume114
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2016

Keywords

  • Chatter stability
  • Cutting force model
  • Ploughing force coefficient
  • Ploughing mechanism
  • Process damping
  • Stability lobe diagram (SLD)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study of static and dynamic ploughing mechanisms by establishing generalized model with static milling forces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this