TY - JOUR
T1 - On the Impact of Regularization Variation on Localized Multiple Kernel Learning
AU - Han, Yina
AU - Yang, Kunde
AU - Yang, Yixin
AU - Ma, Yuanliang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 IEEE.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - This brief analyzes the effects of regularization variations in the localized kernel weights on the hypothesis generated by localized multiple kernel learning (LMKL) algorithms. Recent research on LMKL includes imposing different regularizations on the localized kernel weights and has led to varying formulations and solution strategies. Following the stability analysis theory as presented by Bousquet and Elisseeff, we give stability bounds based on the norm of the variation of localized kernel weights for three LMKL methods cast in the support vector machine classification framework, including vector ℓ p -norm LMKL, matrix-regularized (r,p) -norm LMKL, and samplewise ℓ p -norm LMKL. Further comparison of these bounds helps to qualitatively reveal the performance differences produced by these regularization methods, that is, matrix-regularized LMKL achieves superior performance, followed by vector ℓp -norm LMKL and samplewise ℓp -norm LMKL. Finally, a set of experimental results on ten benchmark machine learning UCI data sets is reported and shown to empirically support our theoretical analysis.
AB - This brief analyzes the effects of regularization variations in the localized kernel weights on the hypothesis generated by localized multiple kernel learning (LMKL) algorithms. Recent research on LMKL includes imposing different regularizations on the localized kernel weights and has led to varying formulations and solution strategies. Following the stability analysis theory as presented by Bousquet and Elisseeff, we give stability bounds based on the norm of the variation of localized kernel weights for three LMKL methods cast in the support vector machine classification framework, including vector ℓ p -norm LMKL, matrix-regularized (r,p) -norm LMKL, and samplewise ℓ p -norm LMKL. Further comparison of these bounds helps to qualitatively reveal the performance differences produced by these regularization methods, that is, matrix-regularized LMKL achieves superior performance, followed by vector ℓp -norm LMKL and samplewise ℓp -norm LMKL. Finally, a set of experimental results on ten benchmark machine learning UCI data sets is reported and shown to empirically support our theoretical analysis.
KW - Generalization bound
KW - multiple kernel learning (MKL)
KW - regularization
KW - stability analysis
KW - support vector machine (SVM)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018521084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2688365
DO - 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2688365
M3 - 文章
C2 - 28422695
AN - SCOPUS:85018521084
SN - 2162-237X
VL - 29
SP - 2625
EP - 2630
JO - IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
JF - IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
IS - 6
ER -