Investigation of residual stress distribution induced during deep rolling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy

To clarify the effects of deep rolling parameters on residual stress, two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element models were developed using the Chaboche hardening model. Both two-dimensional and three-dimensional simulation results were compared with experimental results. The three-dimensional model is more accurate, especially the 90° cut-out model. The maximum errors in the longitudinal and circumferential directions of 90° cut-out are 8.9% and 15.6%, respectively. Compared to 20 MPa, a rolling pressure of 38 MPa results in larger and deeper compressive residual stress in both directions, but lower surface residual stress in the circumferential direction. Compared to 30% overlap, 60% overlap produces larger compressive residual stress in the near surface region in the longitudinal direction and deeper residual stress with lower maximum compressive residual stress in the circumferential direction. The friction coefficient only slightly affects residual stress in the circumferential direction; increasing the rolling speed induces higher near surface residual stress in the circumferential direction. Compared to the HG6 tool, the HG8 tool generates decreasing surface residual stresses and deeper residual stress in both directions. Compared to one pass, two passes significantly increase the residual stress in circumferential direction, but only slightly increase the residual stress in the longitudinal direction.