TY - JOUR
T1 - Image Feature Correspondence Selection
T2 - A Comparative Study and a New Contribution
AU - Zhao, Chen
AU - Cao, Zhiguo
AU - Yang, Jiaqi
AU - Xian, Ke
AU - Li, Xin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1992-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Image feature correspondence selection is pivotal to many computer vision tasks from object recognition to 3D reconstruction. Although many correspondence selection algorithms have been developed in the past decade, there still lacks an in-depth evaluation and comparison in the open literature, which makes it difficult to choose the appropriate algorithm for a specific application. This paper attempts to fill this gap by evaluating eight competing correspondence selection algorithms including both classical methods and current state-of-the-art ones. In addition to preselected correspondences, we have compared different combinations of detector and descriptor on four standard datasets. The diversity of those datasets cover a wide range of uncertainty factors including zoom, rotation, blur, viewpoint change, JPEG compression, light change, different rendering styles and multiple structures. We have measured the quality of competing correspondence selection algorithms in terms of four performance metrics - i.e., precision, recall, F-measure and efficiency. Moreover, we propose to combine the strengths of eight competing methods by combining their correspondence selection results. Extensive experimental results are reported to demonstrate the superiority of several fusion strategies to individual methods, which suggests the possibility of adaptively combining those methods for even better performance.
AB - Image feature correspondence selection is pivotal to many computer vision tasks from object recognition to 3D reconstruction. Although many correspondence selection algorithms have been developed in the past decade, there still lacks an in-depth evaluation and comparison in the open literature, which makes it difficult to choose the appropriate algorithm for a specific application. This paper attempts to fill this gap by evaluating eight competing correspondence selection algorithms including both classical methods and current state-of-the-art ones. In addition to preselected correspondences, we have compared different combinations of detector and descriptor on four standard datasets. The diversity of those datasets cover a wide range of uncertainty factors including zoom, rotation, blur, viewpoint change, JPEG compression, light change, different rendering styles and multiple structures. We have measured the quality of competing correspondence selection algorithms in terms of four performance metrics - i.e., precision, recall, F-measure and efficiency. Moreover, we propose to combine the strengths of eight competing methods by combining their correspondence selection results. Extensive experimental results are reported to demonstrate the superiority of several fusion strategies to individual methods, which suggests the possibility of adaptively combining those methods for even better performance.
KW - correspondence selection
KW - feature matching
KW - Image feature correspondence
KW - inliers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079690237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TIP.2019.2962678
DO - 10.1109/TIP.2019.2962678
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85079690237
SN - 1057-7149
VL - 29
SP - 3506
EP - 3519
JO - IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
JF - IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
M1 - 8949766
ER -