TY - JOUR
T1 - Film cooling performance comparison at different positions on blade suction side
AU - Wang, Kefei
AU - Luo, Jianxia
AU - Tian, Shuqing
AU - Zhu, Huiren
AU - Liu, Cong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Editorial Department of Journal of Aerospace Power. All right reserved.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Film cooling performances of two fan shaped film holes at different positions on blade suction side were experimentally studied in a linear transonic cascade. The film cooling effectiveness of the fan shaped film holes on blade suction side was measured at mainstream inlet Reynolds number of 3.7×105, different mainstream exit Mach number of 0.81, 0.91, 1.01, and different blowing ratio of 0.6-2.1. Results shows the film hole 2 is at the position with higher curvature, where the mainstream forces the coolant to better flow along the surface, however, this has both advantages and disadvantages. At smaller blowing ratio, the jet of film hole can flow close to the wall itself, so the advantage of the mainstream isn't obvious, but the mainstream forces the coolant to flow downstream and the coolant will be difficult for spanwise flow, bringing about lower film cooling effectiveness. At higher blowing ratio, the jet of film hole has large vertical velocity component, the coolant can be easily lifted off, then coolant of the film hole 2 can be forced to get close to the wall, so the film cooling effectiveness is increased substantially.
AB - Film cooling performances of two fan shaped film holes at different positions on blade suction side were experimentally studied in a linear transonic cascade. The film cooling effectiveness of the fan shaped film holes on blade suction side was measured at mainstream inlet Reynolds number of 3.7×105, different mainstream exit Mach number of 0.81, 0.91, 1.01, and different blowing ratio of 0.6-2.1. Results shows the film hole 2 is at the position with higher curvature, where the mainstream forces the coolant to better flow along the surface, however, this has both advantages and disadvantages. At smaller blowing ratio, the jet of film hole can flow close to the wall itself, so the advantage of the mainstream isn't obvious, but the mainstream forces the coolant to flow downstream and the coolant will be difficult for spanwise flow, bringing about lower film cooling effectiveness. At higher blowing ratio, the jet of film hole has large vertical velocity component, the coolant can be easily lifted off, then coolant of the film hole 2 can be forced to get close to the wall, so the film cooling effectiveness is increased substantially.
KW - Curvature
KW - Film cooling hole
KW - Mach number
KW - Reynolds number
KW - Suction side
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029527719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.06.001
DO - 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.06.001
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85029527719
SN - 1000-8055
VL - 32
SP - 1281
EP - 1288
JO - Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power
JF - Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power
IS - 6
ER -