TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploratory Training for Universal Lesion Detection
T2 - Enhancing Lesion Mining Quality Through Temporal Verification
AU - Bai, Xiaoyu
AU - Chen, Geng
AU - Ma, Benteng
AU - Li, Changyang
AU - Zhang, Jingfeng
AU - Xia, Yong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Universal lesion detection (ULD) has great value in clinical practice as it can detect various lesions across multiple organs. Deep learning-based detectors have great potential but require high-quality annotated training data. In practice, due to cost, expertise requirements, and the diverse nature of lesions, incomplete annotations are encountered. Directly training ULD detectors under this condition can yield suboptimal results. Leading pseudo-label methods rely on a dynamic lesion-mining mechanism operating at the mini-batch level to address this issue. However, the quality of mined lesions is inconsistent across different iterations, potentially limiting performance enhancement. Inspired by the observation that deep models learn concepts with increasing complexity, we propose an exploratory-training-based ULD (ET-ULD) method to assess the reliability of mined lesions over time. Our approach uses a teacher-student detection model where the teacher mines suspicious lesions, which are then combined with incomplete annotations to train the student. On top of that, we design a bounding-box bank to record the mining timestamps. Each image is trained in several rounds, allowing us to get a sequence of timestamps for the mined lesions. If a mined lesion consistently appears, it is likely to be a true lesion, otherwise, it may just be a noise. This serves as a crucial criterion for selecting reliable mined lesions for retraining. Experimental results show that ET-ULD surpass existing state-of-the-art methods on two distinct lesion image datasets. Notably, on the DeepLesion dataset, ET-ULD achieved a 5.4% improvement in Average Precision (AP) over the previous methods, demonstrating its superior performance.
AB - Universal lesion detection (ULD) has great value in clinical practice as it can detect various lesions across multiple organs. Deep learning-based detectors have great potential but require high-quality annotated training data. In practice, due to cost, expertise requirements, and the diverse nature of lesions, incomplete annotations are encountered. Directly training ULD detectors under this condition can yield suboptimal results. Leading pseudo-label methods rely on a dynamic lesion-mining mechanism operating at the mini-batch level to address this issue. However, the quality of mined lesions is inconsistent across different iterations, potentially limiting performance enhancement. Inspired by the observation that deep models learn concepts with increasing complexity, we propose an exploratory-training-based ULD (ET-ULD) method to assess the reliability of mined lesions over time. Our approach uses a teacher-student detection model where the teacher mines suspicious lesions, which are then combined with incomplete annotations to train the student. On top of that, we design a bounding-box bank to record the mining timestamps. Each image is trained in several rounds, allowing us to get a sequence of timestamps for the mined lesions. If a mined lesion consistently appears, it is likely to be a true lesion, otherwise, it may just be a noise. This serves as a crucial criterion for selecting reliable mined lesions for retraining. Experimental results show that ET-ULD surpass existing state-of-the-art methods on two distinct lesion image datasets. Notably, on the DeepLesion dataset, ET-ULD achieved a 5.4% improvement in Average Precision (AP) over the previous methods, demonstrating its superior performance.
KW - DeepLesion
KW - memory bank
KW - missing annotations
KW - universal lesion detection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196707975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3417274
DO - 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3417274
M3 - 文章
C2 - 38905094
AN - SCOPUS:85196707975
SN - 2168-2194
VL - 28
SP - 6117
EP - 6129
JO - IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
JF - IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
IS - 10
ER -