TY - GEN
T1 - Expensive Inequality Constraints Handling Methods Suitable for Dynamic Surrogate-based Optimization
AU - Li, Chunna
AU - Fang, Hai
AU - Gong, Chunlin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - In modern engineering design optimization problems, high-fidelity analyses are always used for evaluating objectives and constraints, which might be quite expensive. Thus, efficient global optimization method should be developed to relieve the computational burden. This paper proposed a dynamic surrogate-based optimization (DSBO) using Kriging model, of which two criteria for selecting infill samples in refinement procedure are employed: maximizing expected improvement (EI) function and minimizing surrogate prediction. The DSBO are validated to be robust and efficient by six standard analytical tests. The inequality constraints are handled by three different means here: constraining EI function, penalizing surrogate prediction, and penalizing objective function. Analytical tests and an engineering optimization problem with inequality constraints are carried out. The results indicate that simultaneous constraining EI function and penalizing surrogate prediction is most efficient for DSBO, and there is no need of adjusting penalty factor.
AB - In modern engineering design optimization problems, high-fidelity analyses are always used for evaluating objectives and constraints, which might be quite expensive. Thus, efficient global optimization method should be developed to relieve the computational burden. This paper proposed a dynamic surrogate-based optimization (DSBO) using Kriging model, of which two criteria for selecting infill samples in refinement procedure are employed: maximizing expected improvement (EI) function and minimizing surrogate prediction. The DSBO are validated to be robust and efficient by six standard analytical tests. The inequality constraints are handled by three different means here: constraining EI function, penalizing surrogate prediction, and penalizing objective function. Analytical tests and an engineering optimization problem with inequality constraints are carried out. The results indicate that simultaneous constraining EI function and penalizing surrogate prediction is most efficient for DSBO, and there is no need of adjusting penalty factor.
KW - dynamic surrogate-based optimization
KW - inequality constraints
KW - Kriging
KW - penalty factor
KW - refinement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071302102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CEC.2019.8790253
DO - 10.1109/CEC.2019.8790253
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85071302102
T3 - 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2019 - Proceedings
SP - 2010
EP - 2017
BT - 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2019 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2019
Y2 - 10 June 2019 through 13 June 2019
ER -