TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the two-γ model and the energy balance process of a Chapman-Jouguet detonation
AU - Li, Qingan
AU - Wang, Ke
AU - Wang, Zhicheng
AU - Sun, Tianyu
AU - Zhao, Minghao
AU - Fan, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Two issues related to the application of Chapman-Jouguet (C-J) theory have been investigated in this study. Firstly, the solution of the two-γ analytical model cannot agree with the exact solution calculated from the Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications (CEA) code even all the required parameters are substituted with the exact ones. To root the source, the original derivation has been reviewed. It is believed that the perfect gas approximation induces the discrepancy, which will result in a huge discrepancy in the heat release at C-J state. Hence, a four-γ model for ideal gases has been derived, whose results are consistent with those from the CEA code though it requires more input parameters. Sensitive analysis implies that the accuracy of the four-γ model is greatly impacted by γ2‾ and qCJ. Besides, a parabola function that can describe the heat release and the lower heating value correlation has been proposed. Using this function, about ±5% relative error of estimated MS can be achieved when γ2‾ is equal to 9/7 for most selected stoichiometric gas mixtures. Secondly, the energy distribution in a C-J detonation process is found quite different when attaching the reference frame to the ground or the detonation wave front. Hence, regarding the C-J state as the equivalent burned state at the exit of a detonation combustor is questionable. Accordingly, a four-step thermodynamic process for a closed system has been developed, which can quantitatively analyze the energy balance process of a C-J detonation. Discussion is made by comparing the process with a traditional steady thermodynamic process as well as constant-volume combustion.
AB - Two issues related to the application of Chapman-Jouguet (C-J) theory have been investigated in this study. Firstly, the solution of the two-γ analytical model cannot agree with the exact solution calculated from the Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications (CEA) code even all the required parameters are substituted with the exact ones. To root the source, the original derivation has been reviewed. It is believed that the perfect gas approximation induces the discrepancy, which will result in a huge discrepancy in the heat release at C-J state. Hence, a four-γ model for ideal gases has been derived, whose results are consistent with those from the CEA code though it requires more input parameters. Sensitive analysis implies that the accuracy of the four-γ model is greatly impacted by γ2‾ and qCJ. Besides, a parabola function that can describe the heat release and the lower heating value correlation has been proposed. Using this function, about ±5% relative error of estimated MS can be achieved when γ2‾ is equal to 9/7 for most selected stoichiometric gas mixtures. Secondly, the energy distribution in a C-J detonation process is found quite different when attaching the reference frame to the ground or the detonation wave front. Hence, regarding the C-J state as the equivalent burned state at the exit of a detonation combustor is questionable. Accordingly, a four-step thermodynamic process for a closed system has been developed, which can quantitatively analyze the energy balance process of a C-J detonation. Discussion is made by comparing the process with a traditional steady thermodynamic process as well as constant-volume combustion.
KW - Detonation
KW - Energy balance
KW - Heat release
KW - Thermodynamic process
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111039537&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106955
DO - 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106955
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85111039537
SN - 1270-9638
VL - 117
JO - Aerospace Science and Technology
JF - Aerospace Science and Technology
M1 - 106955
ER -