TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of multiaxial creep stress rupture criteria for 316H stainless steel at 600 °C
AU - Zhang, Kun
AU - Su, Jie
AU - Tan, Jian Ping
AU - Su, Yu Tai
AU - Wang, Ji
AU - Zhang, Li Ping
AU - Shao, Xue Jiao
AU - Su, Dong Chuan
AU - Liu, Chang Jun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - In this work, the applicability of three different methods, denoted as the direct method, the indirect method, and the simple empirical method based on uniaxial creep damage tolerance parameter, λ, for the determination of multiaxial stress rupture criterion (MSRC) is assessed. The assessment involves four commonly-used MSRCs, the Sdobyrev and Hayhurst-Leckie (denoted as SHL), the Cane, the Nix and the Huddleston MSRCs. To this end, creep tests on both uniaxial and circumferentially-notched tension (CNT) specimens of 316H stainless steel are carried out at three net-section stress levels, that is, 300 MPa, 320 MPa and 340 MPa, and at 600 °C. The results show that all the three methods are suitable for the determination of MSRC for the steel examined. Of these, the direct method data-based simple empirical equation is attractive as it takes good advantage of uniaxial creep data in terms of reflecting the operative creep failure mechanism, and therefore may serve as an alternative for the determination of the SHL MSRC, particularly when multiaxial test data is not available. Moreover, the determined SHL, Cane and Huddleston MSRCs are found to be equally effective in the creep life prediction of both uniaxial and CNT specimens, while the effectiveness of the Nix MSRC in life prediction depends on position for stress output and material. In addition, factors influencing the determination of MSRC for stainless steels are discussed in terms of experimental data available in the literature.
AB - In this work, the applicability of three different methods, denoted as the direct method, the indirect method, and the simple empirical method based on uniaxial creep damage tolerance parameter, λ, for the determination of multiaxial stress rupture criterion (MSRC) is assessed. The assessment involves four commonly-used MSRCs, the Sdobyrev and Hayhurst-Leckie (denoted as SHL), the Cane, the Nix and the Huddleston MSRCs. To this end, creep tests on both uniaxial and circumferentially-notched tension (CNT) specimens of 316H stainless steel are carried out at three net-section stress levels, that is, 300 MPa, 320 MPa and 340 MPa, and at 600 °C. The results show that all the three methods are suitable for the determination of MSRC for the steel examined. Of these, the direct method data-based simple empirical equation is attractive as it takes good advantage of uniaxial creep data in terms of reflecting the operative creep failure mechanism, and therefore may serve as an alternative for the determination of the SHL MSRC, particularly when multiaxial test data is not available. Moreover, the determined SHL, Cane and Huddleston MSRCs are found to be equally effective in the creep life prediction of both uniaxial and CNT specimens, while the effectiveness of the Nix MSRC in life prediction depends on position for stress output and material. In addition, factors influencing the determination of MSRC for stainless steels are discussed in terms of experimental data available in the literature.
KW - Creep damage tolerance parameter
KW - Creep life prediction
KW - Multiaxial stress rupture criterion
KW - Skeletal point
KW - Stainless steel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185390744&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105149
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105149
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85185390744
SN - 0308-0161
VL - 208
JO - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
JF - International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
M1 - 105149
ER -