Deng entropy weighted risk priority number model for failure mode and effects analysis

Haixia Zheng, Yongchuan Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), as a commonly used risk management method, has been extensively applied to the engineering domain. A vital parameter in FMEA is the risk priority number (RPN), which is the product of occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D) of a failure mode. To deal with the uncertainty in the assessments given by domain experts, a novel Deng entropy weighted risk priority number (DEWRPN) for FMEA is proposed in the framework of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DST). DEWRPN takes into consideration the relative importance in both risk factors and FMEA experts. The uncertain degree of objective assessments coming from experts are measured by the Deng entropy. An expert's weight is comprised of the three risk factors' weights obtained independently from expert's assessments. In DEWRPN, the strategy of assigning weight for each expert is flexible and compatible to the real decision-making situation. The entropy-based relative weight symbolizes the relative importance. In detail, the higher the uncertain degree of a risk factor from an expert is, the lower the weight of the corresponding risk factor will be and vice versa. We utilize Deng entropy to construct the exponential weight of each risk factor as well as an expert's relative importance on an FMEA item in a state-of-the-art way. A case study is adopted to verify the practicability and effectiveness of the proposed model.

Original languageEnglish
Article number280
JournalEntropy
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Dempster-shafer evidence theory (DST)
  • Deng entropy
  • Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)
  • Risk priority number (RPN)
  • Uncertainty management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deng entropy weighted risk priority number model for failure mode and effects analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this