TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific AI systems require domain-aware robustness validation
AU - Zhang, Jun Jie
AU - Song, Jiahao
AU - Wang, Xiu Cheng
AU - Li, Fu Peng
AU - Liu, Zehan
AU - Chen, Jian Nan
AU - Dang, Haoning
AU - Wang, Shiyao
AU - Zhang, Yiyan
AU - Xu, Jianhui
AU - Shi, Chunxiang
AU - Wang, Fei
AU - Pang, Long Gang
AU - Cheng, Nan
AU - Zhang, Weiwei
AU - Zhang, Duo
AU - Meng, Deyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors.
PY - 2026/7/15
Y1 - 2026/7/15
N2 - AI has become an essential tool in many areas of scientific discovery. However, its robustness, particularly in high-stakes scientific applications, remains insufficiently understood. While adversarial vulnerabilities have been widely studied in image recognition, their implications in scientific disciplines, where physical constraints and numerical stability are critical, have not been thoroughly explored. This work presents a systematic evaluation of AI model fragility across five scientific domains: climate modeling, quantum chemistry, fluid dynamics, quantum chromodynamics, and wireless communications. We demonstrate that small, structured perturbations can destabilize predictions in all of these domains, even in models that achieve high accuracy under normal conditions. Furthermore, the failure patterns vary across domains, suggesting that these vulnerabilities are domain specific. Our findings underscore the importance of assessing AI robustness in scientific contexts and offer preliminary insights into how to design more resilient and reliable AI systems for scientific applications.
AB - AI has become an essential tool in many areas of scientific discovery. However, its robustness, particularly in high-stakes scientific applications, remains insufficiently understood. While adversarial vulnerabilities have been widely studied in image recognition, their implications in scientific disciplines, where physical constraints and numerical stability are critical, have not been thoroughly explored. This work presents a systematic evaluation of AI model fragility across five scientific domains: climate modeling, quantum chemistry, fluid dynamics, quantum chromodynamics, and wireless communications. We demonstrate that small, structured perturbations can destabilize predictions in all of these domains, even in models that achieve high accuracy under normal conditions. Furthermore, the failure patterns vary across domains, suggesting that these vulnerabilities are domain specific. Our findings underscore the importance of assessing AI robustness in scientific contexts and offer preliminary insights into how to design more resilient and reliable AI systems for scientific applications.
KW - AI for science
KW - adversarial robustness
KW - domain-aware robustness validation
KW - gradient-aligned perturbations
KW - neural operator robustness
KW - physics-informed machine learning
KW - robustness–accuracy trade-off
KW - scientific AI
KW - scientific machine learning
KW - trustworthy AI
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042505388
U2 - 10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103400
DO - 10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103400
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105042505388
SN - 2666-3864
VL - 7
JO - Cell Reports Physical Science
JF - Cell Reports Physical Science
IS - 7
M1 - 103400
ER -