跳到主要导航 跳到搜索 跳到主要内容

Meta-Analysis of Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads via Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Yang Hui
  • , Tang Ruihua
  • , Li Jing
  • , Liu Yaxiong
  • , Li Ji
  • , Ye Linjie
  • , Shao Dongyan
  • , Jin Mingliang
  • , Huang Qingsheng
  • , Shi Junling

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

13 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin-eluting beads combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared with conventional TACE (cTACE).

METHODOLOGY: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched for articles published to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and side effects between DEB-TACE and cTACE. The RR (relative risk) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the Revman 5.0 software.

RESULTS: Totally 4 studies, including 527 patients, compared the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE with cTACE. The DEB-TACE achieved fewer side effects in alopecia (p = 0.0002, RR = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.24) and myelosuppression (p = 0.009, RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.75). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in efficacy evaluation including complete response (p = 0.16, RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.89-2.08), partial response (p = 0.48, RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.80-1.62), stable disease (p = 0.73, RR = 0.93,95% CI: 0.60-1.40), progressive disease (p 0.19, RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.56-1.12), objective response (p = 0.26, RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.48-1.72) and disease control (p = 0.05, RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39).

CONCLUSIONS: DEB-TACE shows similar therapeutic efficacy to cTACE method and fewer adverse events.

源语言英语
页(从-至)1002-1006
页数5
期刊Hepato-gastroenterology
62
140
出版状态已出版 - 1 6月 2015

学术指纹

探究 'Meta-Analysis of Doxorubicin-Eluting Beads via Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的学术指纹。

引用此