TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical properties of HTPB propellants
T2 - Recent advances and underlying mechanisms
AU - Qazi, Wasiullah
AU - Pu, Rui
AU - Qin, Yuan
AU - Yan, Qi Long
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB)-based composite solid propellants (CSPs) are widely used in solid rocket motors due to their excellent mechanical properties and low cost. This review synthesizes recent progress on how strain rate, temperature, confinement, aging, and compositional design govern the tensile/compressive strength, Young's modulus, and maximum strain of HTPB-based CSPs. Compiled room-temperature data show that as tensile strain rate increases from ∼10−4–10−1 s−1, tensile strength typically rises from ∼0.15 to ∼0.96 MPa, Young's modulus from ∼2.45 to ∼8.79 MPa, while maximum strain decreases from ∼0.73 to ∼0.28 MPa. At ∼0.03 s−1, lowering the temperature from 293 K to 223 K increases strength (∼0.37 → 1.48 MPa) and modulus (∼7.07 → 35.30 MPa) while reducing maximum strain (∼0.30–0.61 → 0.15–0.22), consistent with thermo-softening and brittle-to-ductile transitions. This review also delves into the underlying mechanisms driving these property changes, focusing on the roles of binder systems, solid fillers, plasticizers, bonding agents, and core-shell structured fillers. Interfacial engineering further tailors properties, such as MD (molecular dynamics) simulation-guided cyclic borate ester bonding agents increased adhesion work by up to ∼17 % relative to HTPB–RDX baselines, and core–shell fillers (e.g., AP@Al, Al@RDX) enable formulation-level control of rate/temperature responses. The review consolidates these trends and maps multi-factor interactions to guide the design of tougher, more reliable HTPB-based CSPs.
AB - Hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB)-based composite solid propellants (CSPs) are widely used in solid rocket motors due to their excellent mechanical properties and low cost. This review synthesizes recent progress on how strain rate, temperature, confinement, aging, and compositional design govern the tensile/compressive strength, Young's modulus, and maximum strain of HTPB-based CSPs. Compiled room-temperature data show that as tensile strain rate increases from ∼10−4–10−1 s−1, tensile strength typically rises from ∼0.15 to ∼0.96 MPa, Young's modulus from ∼2.45 to ∼8.79 MPa, while maximum strain decreases from ∼0.73 to ∼0.28 MPa. At ∼0.03 s−1, lowering the temperature from 293 K to 223 K increases strength (∼0.37 → 1.48 MPa) and modulus (∼7.07 → 35.30 MPa) while reducing maximum strain (∼0.30–0.61 → 0.15–0.22), consistent with thermo-softening and brittle-to-ductile transitions. This review also delves into the underlying mechanisms driving these property changes, focusing on the roles of binder systems, solid fillers, plasticizers, bonding agents, and core-shell structured fillers. Interfacial engineering further tailors properties, such as MD (molecular dynamics) simulation-guided cyclic borate ester bonding agents increased adhesion work by up to ∼17 % relative to HTPB–RDX baselines, and core–shell fillers (e.g., AP@Al, Al@RDX) enable formulation-level control of rate/temperature responses. The review consolidates these trends and maps multi-factor interactions to guide the design of tougher, more reliable HTPB-based CSPs.
KW - Aging mechanisms
KW - Core-shell structures
KW - HTPB-based composite propellants
KW - Interfacial bonding
KW - Mechanical properties
KW - Tensile strength
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025096558
U2 - 10.1016/j.enmf.2025.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.enmf.2025.12.001
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105025096558
SN - 2666-6472
VL - 6
SP - 548
EP - 567
JO - Energetic Materials Frontiers
JF - Energetic Materials Frontiers
IS - 4
ER -