TY - JOUR
T1 - Leading-edge nose droop suppresses cloud cavitation through pressure recovery reorganization and confined vapor-liquid shear layer momentum exchange
AU - Wu, Bilin
AU - Mao, Zhaoyong
AU - Tian, Wenlong
AU - Zhang, Baoshou
AU - Wang, Wei
AU - Ding, Wenjun
AU - Wang, Jiale
AU - Zhang, Tianqi
AU - Zhang, Jiming
AU - Li, Bo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2026/8
Y1 - 2026/8
N2 - Cloud cavitation is governed by pressure recovery and vapor-liquid shear layer instability. How leading-edge nose droop modifies this coupled process to suppress cloud shedding remains unclear. Large-eddy simulations are performed to examine how parameterized nose droop affects pressure redistribution, near-wall flow response, and cloud shedding. The deformation region ratio and nose-drop ratio are used to control the streamwise extent and amplitude of the local geometric modification. In non-cavitating flow, nose droop weakens the suction peak, increases near-wall shear, and delays chordwise boundary layer development. Under cavitating conditions, moderate deformation ( x 0/C = 0.4, d 0/ x 0 = 0.1) reorganizes pressure recovery: a near-zero pressure gradient plateau appears around mid chord, confining adverse gradients to a narrow closure region. This pressure redistribution is accompanied by a shift of the vapor-liquid shear layer from strong off-wall exchange to weak near-wall confinement. The Reynolds shear stress peak moves from y /C ≈ 0.025 for the baseline to y /C < 0.01, indicating a more wall-attached shear layer state. The cycle-averaged cavity volume drops from 0.219 to 0.002, corresponding to a reduction above 99%, and sustained organized cloud shedding is largely suppressed. Excessive nose droop moves the closure downstream, where adverse gradients and localized unsteadiness reappear, indicating a finite effective deformation window. These results suggest that cloud cavitation suppression is associated with confined adverse pressure gradients, weakened off-wall shear layer exchange, and reduced turbulent momentum transport toward the cavity closure.
AB - Cloud cavitation is governed by pressure recovery and vapor-liquid shear layer instability. How leading-edge nose droop modifies this coupled process to suppress cloud shedding remains unclear. Large-eddy simulations are performed to examine how parameterized nose droop affects pressure redistribution, near-wall flow response, and cloud shedding. The deformation region ratio and nose-drop ratio are used to control the streamwise extent and amplitude of the local geometric modification. In non-cavitating flow, nose droop weakens the suction peak, increases near-wall shear, and delays chordwise boundary layer development. Under cavitating conditions, moderate deformation ( x 0/C = 0.4, d 0/ x 0 = 0.1) reorganizes pressure recovery: a near-zero pressure gradient plateau appears around mid chord, confining adverse gradients to a narrow closure region. This pressure redistribution is accompanied by a shift of the vapor-liquid shear layer from strong off-wall exchange to weak near-wall confinement. The Reynolds shear stress peak moves from y /C ≈ 0.025 for the baseline to y /C < 0.01, indicating a more wall-attached shear layer state. The cycle-averaged cavity volume drops from 0.219 to 0.002, corresponding to a reduction above 99%, and sustained organized cloud shedding is largely suppressed. Excessive nose droop moves the closure downstream, where adverse gradients and localized unsteadiness reappear, indicating a finite effective deformation window. These results suggest that cloud cavitation suppression is associated with confined adverse pressure gradients, weakened off-wall shear layer exchange, and reduced turbulent momentum transport toward the cavity closure.
KW - Cloud cavitation
KW - Leading-edge nose droop
KW - Pressure recovery
KW - Vapor-liquid shear layer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105045158597
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2026.105852
DO - 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2026.105852
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105045158597
SN - 0301-9322
VL - 202
JO - International Journal of Multiphase Flow
JF - International Journal of Multiphase Flow
M1 - 105852
ER -