TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Evaluation of Cold-Sprayed and Electroplated Copper Coatings
T2 - Enhanced Performance Characteristics and an Alternative Copper Coating Approach
AU - Tian, Tianxiao
AU - Xu, Yaxin
AU - Wang, Cong
AU - Li, Wenya
AU - Fu, Shuo
AU - Zhao, Chaochao
AU - Geng, Shuai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ASM International 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - To clarify performance differences between cold-sprayed copper coatings (CS-Cu) and electroplated copper coatings (EP-Cu), and optimize the cold spray process for efficient fabrication of high-performance Cu coatings, this study investigated the effects of spray gas temperature/pressure, spray distance, and gun traverse speed on the microstructure and properties of CS-Cu on AA6061 substrate via orthogonal experiments, and systematically compared the optimized CS-Cu with the EP-Cu. Optimization results showed that CS-Cu at specific parameters achieved optimal comprehensive performance, featuring low porosity, high hardness, and strong bonding strength. Microstructurally, CS-Cu was thicker and denser than EP-Cu, and was free of obvious interfacial. Mechanically, CS-Cu outperformed EP-Cu in elastic modulus and hardness. Wear tests revealed that CS-Cu had a lower steady-state friction coefficient and smaller wear volume (dominant abrasive wear), whereas EP-Cu exhibited inferior wear resistance and complex mechanisms due to weak interfacial bonding. CS-Cu also exhibited superior corrosion resistance, characterized by a self-corrosion current density of approximately 44% that of EP-Cu. In conclusion, optimized cold spray parameters produce dense, high-performance Cu coatings offering theoretical and experimental support for replacing electroplating in high-performance coating fabrication.
AB - To clarify performance differences between cold-sprayed copper coatings (CS-Cu) and electroplated copper coatings (EP-Cu), and optimize the cold spray process for efficient fabrication of high-performance Cu coatings, this study investigated the effects of spray gas temperature/pressure, spray distance, and gun traverse speed on the microstructure and properties of CS-Cu on AA6061 substrate via orthogonal experiments, and systematically compared the optimized CS-Cu with the EP-Cu. Optimization results showed that CS-Cu at specific parameters achieved optimal comprehensive performance, featuring low porosity, high hardness, and strong bonding strength. Microstructurally, CS-Cu was thicker and denser than EP-Cu, and was free of obvious interfacial. Mechanically, CS-Cu outperformed EP-Cu in elastic modulus and hardness. Wear tests revealed that CS-Cu had a lower steady-state friction coefficient and smaller wear volume (dominant abrasive wear), whereas EP-Cu exhibited inferior wear resistance and complex mechanisms due to weak interfacial bonding. CS-Cu also exhibited superior corrosion resistance, characterized by a self-corrosion current density of approximately 44% that of EP-Cu. In conclusion, optimized cold spray parameters produce dense, high-performance Cu coatings offering theoretical and experimental support for replacing electroplating in high-performance coating fabrication.
KW - AA6061 aluminum alloy
KW - cold spray
KW - copper coating
KW - electroplating
KW - microstructure and property
KW - process optimization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105046240785
U2 - 10.1007/s11666-026-02294-3
DO - 10.1007/s11666-026-02294-3
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:105046240785
SN - 1059-9630
JO - Journal of Thermal Spray Technology
JF - Journal of Thermal Spray Technology
ER -