TY - JOUR
T1 - The preferential orientation of the directionally solidified Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite
AU - Cui, Chunjuan
AU - Zhang, Jun
AU - Wu, Guannan
AU - Su, Haijun
AU - Han, Min
AU - Liu, Lin
AU - Fu, Hengzhi
PY - 2007/11/1
Y1 - 2007/11/1
N2 - The Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite is a favorable field emission material due to relatively low work function, good electron conductivity, and three-dimensional array of Schottky junctions grown in the composite spontaneously. The preferential orientation during directional solidification is determined by the growth anisotropy. In order to obtain the preferential direction of the steady-state crystal growth, the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is used for analysis. It is found that the preferential orientation of the Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite prepared by Czochralski (CZ) technique is [3 3̄ 2̄] Si∥[0 0 0 1] TaSi2, (2 2 0)Si∥(2 2̄ 0 0) TaSi2. Whereas the preferential orientation of the Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite prepared by electron beam floating zone melting (EBFZM) technique is [0 1̄ 1̄ ]] Si∥[0 0 0 1] TaSi2,(0 1̄ 1) Si∥(0 1̄ 1 1)TaSi2. The preferential directions of the Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composites prepared by two kinds of crystal growth techniques are distinctly different from each other, which results from different solid-liquid interface temperatures on account of the different crystal growth conditions, e.g. different solidification rate, different temperature gradient, different solid-liquid interface curvature and different kinetic undercooling.
AB - The Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite is a favorable field emission material due to relatively low work function, good electron conductivity, and three-dimensional array of Schottky junctions grown in the composite spontaneously. The preferential orientation during directional solidification is determined by the growth anisotropy. In order to obtain the preferential direction of the steady-state crystal growth, the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is used for analysis. It is found that the preferential orientation of the Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite prepared by Czochralski (CZ) technique is [3 3̄ 2̄] Si∥[0 0 0 1] TaSi2, (2 2 0)Si∥(2 2̄ 0 0) TaSi2. Whereas the preferential orientation of the Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composite prepared by electron beam floating zone melting (EBFZM) technique is [0 1̄ 1̄ ]] Si∥[0 0 0 1] TaSi2,(0 1̄ 1) Si∥(0 1̄ 1 1)TaSi2. The preferential directions of the Si-TaSi2 eutectic in situ composites prepared by two kinds of crystal growth techniques are distinctly different from each other, which results from different solid-liquid interface temperatures on account of the different crystal growth conditions, e.g. different solidification rate, different temperature gradient, different solid-liquid interface curvature and different kinetic undercooling.
KW - A1. Directional solidification
KW - A1. Eutectic in situ composite
KW - A1. Transmission electron microscopy
KW - A2. Czochralski method
KW - A2. Electron beam floating zone melting
KW - B2. Si-TaSi
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35649024258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.09.001
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:35649024258
SN - 0022-0248
VL - 309
SP - 93
EP - 96
JO - Journal of Crystal Growth
JF - Journal of Crystal Growth
IS - 1
ER -