TY - GEN
T1 - Study on Aerodynamic Effect of Leading-Edge Radius Error and Tolerance Design Considering Compressor Airfoil Size Characteristic
AU - Dan, Yue
AU - Gao, Limin
AU - Yang, Guang
AU - Li, Ruiyu
AU - Wang, Haohao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The aerodynamic layout of compressor blades has difference with the position varying, so the blade size characteristics are different. If the size characteristics are not considered, it is worth discussing whether it is reasonable to use the same range of tolerance constraints for the same type of machining errors. To study the above issue, a subsonic airfoil is taken as the research object, and its size is magnified by 1 time to obtain 2 sets of cascades with 1 time difference in the chord length, and the leading-edge radius errors are added to explore the difference in the effect on the deviation degree and scatter of the aerodynamic performance. The results show that when the geometric size increases, the influence degree of the leading-edge radius error on the performance deviation decreases. When the relative value of the leading-edge radius error is equal to that of the chord length, the performance deviation degree of 2 sets of cascades almost coincides. Due to the influence of error uncertainty, the performance scatter of 2 sets of cascades is almost doubled, and the large-size one is smaller, indicating that the rationality of using the same range of tolerance constraints for different sizes of airfoils is insufficient, and it should be considered comprehensively in combination with its size characteristics. In addition, from the perspective of qualified aerodynamic performance, the acceptance range of performance is set, and the error bounds are back-calculated by the uncertainty quantification method. It is found that the error range of the large-size one is wider. The greater the scatter of aerodynamic performance, the more stringent tolerance constraints are needed. The research work aims to further establish the relationship between blade machining and performance research, and to provide a new idea for the design of machining tolerance range in engineering.
AB - The aerodynamic layout of compressor blades has difference with the position varying, so the blade size characteristics are different. If the size characteristics are not considered, it is worth discussing whether it is reasonable to use the same range of tolerance constraints for the same type of machining errors. To study the above issue, a subsonic airfoil is taken as the research object, and its size is magnified by 1 time to obtain 2 sets of cascades with 1 time difference in the chord length, and the leading-edge radius errors are added to explore the difference in the effect on the deviation degree and scatter of the aerodynamic performance. The results show that when the geometric size increases, the influence degree of the leading-edge radius error on the performance deviation decreases. When the relative value of the leading-edge radius error is equal to that of the chord length, the performance deviation degree of 2 sets of cascades almost coincides. Due to the influence of error uncertainty, the performance scatter of 2 sets of cascades is almost doubled, and the large-size one is smaller, indicating that the rationality of using the same range of tolerance constraints for different sizes of airfoils is insufficient, and it should be considered comprehensively in combination with its size characteristics. In addition, from the perspective of qualified aerodynamic performance, the acceptance range of performance is set, and the error bounds are back-calculated by the uncertainty quantification method. It is found that the error range of the large-size one is wider. The greater the scatter of aerodynamic performance, the more stringent tolerance constraints are needed. The research work aims to further establish the relationship between blade machining and performance research, and to provide a new idea for the design of machining tolerance range in engineering.
KW - Aerodynamic effect
KW - Compressor airfoil
KW - Leadingedge radius error
KW - Size characteristic
KW - Tolerance design
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030483019
U2 - 10.1109/CoMEA66280.2025.11241352
DO - 10.1109/CoMEA66280.2025.11241352
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:105030483019
T3 - Proceedings of 2025 International Conference of Mechanical Engineering on Aerospace, CoMEA 2025
BT - Proceedings of 2025 International Conference of Mechanical Engineering on Aerospace, CoMEA 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2025 International Conference of Mechanical Engineering on Aerospace, CoMEA 2025
Y2 - 20 June 2025 through 22 June 2025
ER -