Self-gating in semiconductor electrocatalysis

  • Yongmin He
  • , Qiyuan He
  • , Luqing Wang
  • , Chao Zhu
  • , Prafful Golani
  • , Albertus D. Handoko
  • , Xuechao Yu
  • , Caitian Gao
  • , Mengning Ding
  • , Xuewen Wang
  • , Fucai Liu
  • , Qingsheng Zeng
  • , Peng Yu
  • , Shasha Guo
  • , Boris I. Yakobson
  • , Liang Wang
  • , Zhi Wei Seh
  • , Zhuhua Zhang
  • , Minghong Wu
  • , Qi Jie Wang
  • Hua Zhang, Zheng Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

227 Scopus citations

Abstract

The semiconductor–electrolyte interface dominates the behaviours of semiconductor electrocatalysis, which has been modelled as a Schottky-analogue junction according to classical electron transfer theories. However, this model cannot be used to explain the extremely high carrier accumulations in ultrathin semiconductor catalysis observed in our work. Inspired by the recently developed ion-controlled electronics, we revisit the semiconductor–electrolyte interface and unravel a universal self-gating phenomenon through microcell-based in situ electronic/electrochemical measurements to clarify the electronic-conduction modulation of semiconductors during the electrocatalytic reaction. We then demonstrate that the type of semiconductor catalyst strongly correlates with their electrocatalysis; that is, n-type semiconductor catalysts favour cathodic reactions such as the hydrogen evolution reaction, p-type ones prefer anodic reactions such as the oxygen evolution reaction and bipolar ones tend to perform both anodic and cathodic reactions. Our study provides new insight into the electronic origin of the semiconductor–electrolyte interface during electrocatalysis, paving the way for designing high-performance semiconductor catalysts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1098-1104
Number of pages7
JournalNature Materials
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Self-gating in semiconductor electrocatalysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this