TY - JOUR
T1 - Mortality weighting-based method for aggregate urban air risk assessment
AU - Zhang, Qing Yu
AU - Sun, Guo Jin
AU - Tian, Wei Li
AU - Wei, Yu Mei
AU - Fang, Si Mai
AU - Ruan, Jin Feng
AU - Shan, Guo Rong
AU - Shi, Yao
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - This paper deals with a mortality-weighted synthetic evaluation (MWSE) method for evaluating urban air risk. Sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NO x), and particulate matter (PM10) were used as pollution indices. The urban area of Hangzhou, China is divided into 756 grid cells, with a resolution of 1 km×1 km, and is evaluated using the MWSE and the air quality index (AQI), a widely-used method to evaluate ambient air quality and air risk. In an evaluation of one day in April 2004, the surface areas categorized as levels I and III, as defined by the integrated air risk evaluation, were 27.3% and 3.3% lower, respectively, than grades I and III defined by the AQI evaluation. Meanwhile, the areas classified as level II or above level III by the integrated air risk evaluation were 55.1% and 101.1% higher, respectively, than grade II or above grade III when using the AQI evaluation. From this comparison, we find that the MWSE method is more sensitive than the AQI method. The AQI method uses a single index to assess integrated air quality and is therefore unable to evaluate integrated air risks due to multiple pollutants. The MWSE method overcomes this problem, providing improved accuracy in air risk assessment.
AB - This paper deals with a mortality-weighted synthetic evaluation (MWSE) method for evaluating urban air risk. Sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NO x), and particulate matter (PM10) were used as pollution indices. The urban area of Hangzhou, China is divided into 756 grid cells, with a resolution of 1 km×1 km, and is evaluated using the MWSE and the air quality index (AQI), a widely-used method to evaluate ambient air quality and air risk. In an evaluation of one day in April 2004, the surface areas categorized as levels I and III, as defined by the integrated air risk evaluation, were 27.3% and 3.3% lower, respectively, than grades I and III defined by the AQI evaluation. Meanwhile, the areas classified as level II or above level III by the integrated air risk evaluation were 55.1% and 101.1% higher, respectively, than grade II or above grade III when using the AQI evaluation. From this comparison, we find that the MWSE method is more sensitive than the AQI method. The AQI method uses a single index to assess integrated air quality and is therefore unable to evaluate integrated air risks due to multiple pollutants. The MWSE method overcomes this problem, providing improved accuracy in air risk assessment.
KW - Air pollution
KW - Air quality index (AQI)
KW - Integrated air risk
KW - Mortality-weighted synthetic evaluation (MWSE)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054745061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1631/jzus.A11b0043
DO - 10.1631/jzus.A11b0043
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:80054745061
SN - 1673-565X
VL - 12
SP - 702
EP - 709
JO - Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A
JF - Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A
IS - 9
ER -