Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Laplacian eigenvalue conditions for edge-disjoint spanning trees and a forest with constraints

  • Northwestern Polytechnical University Xian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Let k be a positive integer and let G be a simple graph of order n with minimum degree δ . A graph G is said to have property P(k,d) if it contains k edge-disjoint spanning trees and an additional forest F with edge number |E(F)|>d−1d(|V(G)|−1), such that if F is not a spanning tree, then F has a component with at least d edges. Let D(G) be the degree diagonal matrix of G . We denote λi and μi as the i th largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix A(G) of G and the Laplacian matrix L(G)=D(G)−A(G) of G for i=1,2,…,n, respectively. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between Laplacian eigenvalues and property P(k,δ). Let t be a positive integer, and define Gt as the set of simple graphs such that each G∈Gt contains at least t+1 non-empty disjoint proper subsets V1,V2,…,Vt+1 satisfying V(G)∖⋃i=1t+1Vi≠∅ and edge connectivity κ(G)=e(Vi,V(G)∖Vi) for any i=1,2,…,t+1. For the class of graphs G1 with minimum degree δ , we provide a sufficient condition involving the third smallest Laplacian eigenvalue μn−2(G) for a graph G∈G1 to have property P(k,δ). Similarly, for the class of graphs G2 with minimum degree δ , we establish a corresponding sufficient condition involving the fourth smallest Laplacian eigenvalue μn−3(G) for a graph G∈G2 to have property P(k,δ). Furthermore, we extend the spectral conditions for all the results about μn−2(G), μn−3(G) and λ2(G) to the general graph matrices aD(G)+A(G) and aD(G)+bA(G).

Original languageEnglish
Article number115186
JournalDiscrete Mathematics
Volume349
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2026

Keywords

  • Edge-disjoint spanning trees
  • Laplacian eigenvalues
  • Property P(k,δ)
  • Quotient matrix

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Laplacian eigenvalue conditions for edge-disjoint spanning trees and a forest with constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this