Dynamics of vibration mode competition between flutter and forced vibration in thin-walled scramjet isolators under fluctuating backpressure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Backpressure fluctuations in thin-walled scramjet isolators can induce vibration mode competition between the intrinsic flutter of elastic panels and forced vibration, yet the underlying dynamics of this interaction remain insufficiently understood. This study employed a two-way coupled CFD/CSD framework to investigate the interplay and competition between the panel’s intrinsic flutter and the forced vibration induced by periodic backpressure fluctuations over a broad range of fluctuation frequencies (fb) and amplitudes (Ab). Under steady backpressure, the elastic panel exhibits flutter-dominated limit cycle oscillations. When fluctuating backpressure is introduced, periodic excitation superimposes on the intrinsic flutter, giving rise to four distinct dynamic regimes: (i) flutter-dominated regime at low fb; (ii) forced-vibration regime at mid fb with resonance near panel’s natural frequency; (iii) a transitional regime with a coupled frequency; and (iv) flutter re-emergence at high fb. At higher Ab, only the flutter-dominated and forced-vibration regimes occur, separated by clear fb boundaries. With increasing fb, the panel starts in flutter dominance with near constant oscillation amplitudes, transitions to forced vibration near resonance with rapid amplitude growth, and returns to flutter dominance beyond resonance. Reducing Ab lowers the direct energy input from backpressure fluctuations and promotes the emergence of the transitional regime, which occurs more frequently and persist longer, blurring the regime boundaries between flutter and forced vibration. As a result, vibration mode competition fundamentally governs the structural response, which in turn controls shock-train motion, separation behavior, and overall isolator performance. Regime transitions cause abrupt changes in mean values and oscillation amplitudes of these flow features, with resonance exerting the strongest influence by driving extrema in both metrics. Away from resonance, flutter- or transitional-dominated regimes exhibit weaker sensitivity to fb, although large Ab can still generate significant unsteadiness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number111747
JournalAerospace Science and Technology
Volume173
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • Aeroelasticity
  • Flutter
  • Isolator
  • Mode competition
  • Panel
  • Resonance
  • Shock train

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamics of vibration mode competition between flutter and forced vibration in thin-walled scramjet isolators under fluctuating backpressure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this