Corrigendum to “The crack initiation behavior and the fatigue limit of Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe titanium alloy with basket-weave microstructure” [J. Alloys Compd. 631 (2015) 340–349](S0925838815001504)(10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.077)

The authors regret 1. The Fig. 2(b), (c) and (d) should be replaced, the corrected version is in the following.[Figure presented] 2. The subsurface-crack initiation ratios (%) for process D and E are wrongly typed in Table 5, the correct version is in the following. [Table presented] 3. The fatigue specimens shown in Fig. 4(e) and Fig. 5 (e) were not inlaid before grinding and etching, this led to the oxide layer or oxygen diffusion zone introduced by WEDM were not thoroughly removed. Thus the microstructures shown in this figures are not satisfying, especially for Fig. 5(e). The authors think that the Fig. 5(e) should be removed, which will not influence the result of this paper. The corrected Fig. 5 is shown in the following. Meanwhile, the text “Fig. 5(e) shows the initiation region metallograph of Fig. 5(d). Just like the case of microstructure A described above, a cluster of blocky α phase are located at the initiation site. This indicates that the fatigue crack initiated at the blocky α cluster for the subsurface-crack initiation specimen of microstructure B as well.” should be deleted from the original paper.[Figure