Calculation of solid-liquid interfacial free energy of Cu by two different methods

Huaguang Zhou; Xin Lin; Meng Wang; Weidong Huang

doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.007

Calculation of solid-liquid interfacial free energy of Cu by two different methods

Huaguang Zhou
, Xin Lin
, Meng Wang
, Weidong Huang

School of Materials Sience and Engineering

Northwestern Polytechnical University Xian

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Both the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and Turnbull coefficient calculated by the capillary fluctuation method (CFM) are consistent with those by the critical nucleus method (CNM). The calculated solid-liquid interfacial free energy by CNM is more accurate than that by CFM, but CFM can give the anisotropy parameter of solid-liquid interfacial free energy while CNM can not. Thus, these two methods can be combined to calculate the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and its anisotropy.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	107-111
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Crystal Growth
Volume	377
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.007
State	Published - 2013

Keywords

A1. Computer simulation
A1. Interfaces
A1. Nucleation
B1. Metals

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.007

Cite this

@article{c47724e1d5f74478ad56899178775e99,

title = "Calculation of solid-liquid interfacial free energy of Cu by two different methods",

abstract = "Both the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and Turnbull coefficient calculated by the capillary fluctuation method (CFM) are consistent with those by the critical nucleus method (CNM). The calculated solid-liquid interfacial free energy by CNM is more accurate than that by CFM, but CFM can give the anisotropy parameter of solid-liquid interfacial free energy while CNM can not. Thus, these two methods can be combined to calculate the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and its anisotropy.",

keywords = "A1. Computer simulation, A1. Interfaces, A1. Nucleation, B1. Metals",

author = "Huaguang Zhou and Xin Lin and Meng Wang and Weidong Huang",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.007",

language = "英语",

volume = "377",

pages = "107--111",

journal = "Journal of Crystal Growth",

issn = "0022-0248",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calculation of solid-liquid interfacial free energy of Cu by two different methods

AU - Zhou, Huaguang

AU - Lin, Xin

AU - Wang, Meng

AU - Huang, Weidong

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Both the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and Turnbull coefficient calculated by the capillary fluctuation method (CFM) are consistent with those by the critical nucleus method (CNM). The calculated solid-liquid interfacial free energy by CNM is more accurate than that by CFM, but CFM can give the anisotropy parameter of solid-liquid interfacial free energy while CNM can not. Thus, these two methods can be combined to calculate the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and its anisotropy.

AB - Both the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and Turnbull coefficient calculated by the capillary fluctuation method (CFM) are consistent with those by the critical nucleus method (CNM). The calculated solid-liquid interfacial free energy by CNM is more accurate than that by CFM, but CFM can give the anisotropy parameter of solid-liquid interfacial free energy while CNM can not. Thus, these two methods can be combined to calculate the solid-liquid interfacial free energy and its anisotropy.

KW - A1. Computer simulation

KW - A1. Interfaces

KW - A1. Nucleation

KW - B1. Metals

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84878695342

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.05.007

M3 - 文章

AN - SCOPUS:84878695342

SN - 0022-0248

VL - 377

SP - 107

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Crystal Growth

JF - Journal of Crystal Growth

ER -

Calculation of solid-liquid interfacial free energy of Cu by two different methods

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this