Abstract
Despite recent advances, the generalizability of Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) decoding models is constrained by rigid tokenization and entangled embedding strategies. Current foundational models suffer from two major drawbacks: (1) blindly slicing continuous signals into fixed-length pieces destroys the structure of neural events. (2) Forcing diverse brain rhythms into a single embedding space erases the distinction between different biological states. Consequently, the learned representations lack physiological meaning, leading to poor clinical interpretability and reduced classification accuracy. This paper contributes a neurodynamic framework that jointly addresses both challenges. First, we propose the hybrid Dynamic Segment Tokenizer (DyST), which replaces fixed-patch tokenization methods by adaptively partitioning EEG based on its intrinsic dynamics. It generates tokens that preserve the integrity of complete neural events. Second, we propose the Band-Routed Adaptive Vector Embedding (BRAVE), which introduces a multi-codebook architecture that guides each token to a codebook corresponding to a specific neural frequency band (δ, θ, μ, β, γ). This creates a disentangled and interpretable representation. Comprehensive evaluations across seven BCI datasets confirm the framework's superiority, improving classification accuracy by up to 9.07% over the LaBraM benchmark. Our findings suggest that replacing rigid patching with dynamic, event-based tokenization and frequency-routed embeddings is worthy for building BCI systems that are both robust across datasets and clinically meaningful.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 110765 |
| Journal | Biomedical Signal Processing and Control |
| Volume | 126 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Oct 2026 |
Keywords
- Brain–Computer Interface
- Deep learning
- EEG decoding
- Electroencephalogram (EEG)
- Feature extraction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A hybrid adaptive EEG signal tokenization and vector embedding framework for interpretable Brain–Computer Interfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver