Abstract
We presented a systematic quality comparison of protein crystals grown using the cross-diffusion microbatch (CDM) and standard sitting-drop vapor diffusion methods. Eleven proteins were screened and it was found that crystals grown using CDM exhibited a better morphology. X-ray diffraction showed that the CDM method is practical and useful for obtaining high-quality protein crystals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5365-5371 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | CrystEngComm |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 29 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 7 Aug 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study on the quality of protein crystals obtained using the cross-diffusion microbatch and sitting-drop vapor diffusion methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver